On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > > > For those of you who care, the RSS updates from BitBucket are far > > superior > > > to those from our current site. I wonder if we can upgrade. > > > > What part would need upgrading? > > Well, I really like the improved RS, where they list the modified > files in the message as links. I do not know if BitBucket is open > source.
Well currently we are using CentOS5 which has hg-1.3.1. I can update it to latest hg if that helps [with some config setting to enable the better RSS feed] - or some patch to hg that does it. I'd rather not try to duplicate bitbucket infrastructure - I not sure about its complexity. Current config is simple with minimal maintainance [and if the machine crashes - easy to migrate to a new one. We successfully did this once] Satish
