On 10/29/07, Richard Tran Mills <rmills at ornl.gov> wrote: > Barry, > > That accomplishes essentially the same thing as Lisandro's proposed > SNESSetLinearSolve() but is more consistent with the existing framework of > PETSc.
> it seems like there ought to be a KSP shell option. But what might > this mess up? But if what you really need is to implement your KSPSHELL->Solve(b,x) by internally using a standard PETSc KSP, then it seems to me bit heavy-weight approach. That the reason I asked for a SNESSetLinearSolve(). -- Lisandro Dalc?n --------------- Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
