On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Brad Aagaard <baagaard at usgs.gov> wrote: > > > Jed, > > > > It looks like your changeset 20985 may have introduced a bug. I just > > pulled and rebuilt petsc-dev. I am trying to run a PyLith simulation that > > worked in parallel with ASM, sbaij matrix, and bs=1 a week ago but now > > fails. I get a memory allocation error (huge allocation) or a memory > > corruption error. Using an aij matrix or running in serial works fine. My > > simulation runs fine with 2 processes but not 3 or 4. The stack traces are > > > > I am trying to understand, but having problems. > > 1) 20985 does not change anything here. Do you mean 20989?
Well these numbers are not unique across repos - however the hex id is unique.. Satish
