On Nov 13, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 18:58, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Does anyone object if I remove DMRefine/CoarsenHierarchy() and just have > DMRefine/Coarsen() take a number of levels argument? > > So: remove DMRefine/Coarsen and then rename the Hierarchy versions? Sounds > fine to me, you can just pass one level. > > The comm argument would be removed from the calling sequence, doesn't work > anyways. > > The need to use the same communicator on coarse grids is pretty limiting, in > my opinion. It may be tricky to implement, but I'm not sure we should remove > it from the interface.
It can be passed in some other way. Barry
