On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 00:57, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> For FEM stuff (like mixed elements, higher order, complicated bases), I > need layout information that maps > > mesh piece ---> (size, offset) > > I made a separate structure to contain this info, but it sounds like this > suped-up PetscLayout could contain it > instead. Is that feasible? > How are you identifying "mesh piece"? This appears to be basically another step removed (but in the same spirit of) the ISLocalToGlobalMapping. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110517/a837af91/attachment.html>
