On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 19:44, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Verification of preprocess code is exactly as intensive, since you have to > compile each version. What is your point here? > You can see all possible variants using a widely used and standardized language with editor support, the turn-around time for a correctness check is less because you don't have to reconfigure. > > The code I had would have continued to work, rather than break. > Why did you bother pulling/updating if you wanted to work with an old version? This sounds more like a problem of you/the build system not knowing when to reconfigure. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110315/4c9063be/attachment.html>
