On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Jed Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 00:06, Matthew Knepley <petsc-maint at > mcs.anl.gov>wrote: > > > 3) It should go into TS > > > Really? It depends on a specific DM implementation. If you offered up a > generic algebraic interface, then it could just be a normal explicit TS. But > it seems to me that DM is a better choice for particle tracking, at least > all the spatial queries and such.
for now pushed the ts change - so the complex + single-library=0 build should work. Satish
