On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:42:05 -0500, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > My point is not only do they get a slower GEEV but they get a slower > everything in LAPACK. [...] Why not just use LAPACK?
Yup, I get your point. But Lapack usually needs a BLAS, and the original (flawed) idea was that a fast BLAS would produce a competitive Lapack. Jed
