On 9 September 2010 20:27, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 September 2010 19:24, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> It seems to me that a nondestructive default would be better. >> I guess there is an expectation that users open viewers to write to >> more than to read from, >> but I think we still don't want to wipe out their files without an >> explicit authorization. >> Dmitry. > > While I agree with both of you, ?changing this makes me a bit nervous > because of the backward compatibility implications... >
Fixed in petsc4py-dev (for binary viewers) http://code.google.com/p/petsc4py/source/detail?r=8f9501ada815a43a29aa44a595f12f3b01a2ab4d -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
