On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 19:48, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > I would say it was spurious, but users building PETSc won't know it is > spurious and I like clean compiles with no warnings (even if the warnings are > wrong). > > Okay, then PETSc needs to avoid any cases of single-malloc for a struct and > member. Is this thread really the only one?
Fixed. I think others got changed a while ago and somehow this one was missed. Barry > > Jed
