On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:21:32 -0500, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > I added it quickly as a bit of a hack. Eventually it needs a lot of > cleaning up. > > It is not actually readonly so shouldn't be listed as a const; it is not a > good name.
When would it be correct to modify the array without incrementing state? I must be missing something. > Can we worry about it later, not now? Of course. Jed
