On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>
>
> On 16 June 2010 21:24, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> As someone else pointed out the BLAS call cannot have the two arguments be
> the same (because it is Fortran) so we've have to handle that case with
> additional ugly checks if we did support the same vector.
>
>
> We could still use VecScale.... Too much black magic?
>
Yes we could. But then do we support the same arguments in VecAYPX(), and
VecWAXPY() and VecAXPBY(). Do we have different pieces of code depending on
which vectors are the same as other vectors? Otherwise we couldn't use const on
arrays etc. I don't see the tiny advantage of having a more general interface
outweighs more complicated code.
Barry
> --
> Lisandro Dalcin
> ---------------
> CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL)
> Predio CONICET-Santa Fe
> Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo
> Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011)
> Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100616/0078198b/attachment.html>
