On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:29:00 -0500, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Jed Brown wrote: > > > The matrix is always written in PETSc ordering, but DA vectors are > > written in natural order. This means that loading a problem with ex10 > > produces a genuinely different RHS than the user had initially, and the > > solution is truly different (not just different by a permutation) when > > they write the problem out on a different number of procs. Should > > -ksp_view_binary push PETSC_VIEWER_NATIVE so that the vector is always > > consistent with the matrix ordering? > > Yes.
f9a259e79427 Jed
