On Jan 28, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > However, its not clear to me that we need this. Rather, we might get > away with just > having PETSc.Configure() give this overall advice at the end. > > What do you think?
Sounds like the way to go. Simple is good.
>
> Matt
>
> thanks,
> satish
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
