On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 20:45, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Why can you not use VecAXPY() on the local Vecs? You're absolutely right. I must have been thinking of error control when I decided this was a problem. You need some sort of norms and don't want to double-count the ghost entries. Jed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101207/b6794a2b/attachment.html>
