On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 21:25, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the "local form" idea implies some mesh with a > stencil or overlap behind a Vec, > which by itself is a purely algebraic construct. Does this mean that we are > injecting some geometry > into Vec's semantics? > Certainly not geometry. It's topologically-derived information which currently sits in VecScatter (ignoring VecGhost for now). Jed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101207/8a048c61/attachment.html>
