On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:56:56 -0300, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 August 2010 10:47, Jed Brown <jed at 59a2.org> wrote: > > > > ?It also helps (me) > > to clarify intent: if I see a Get, then I know the vector is temporary > > without needing to check for a matching Destroy. > > > > You need a matching Restore()
Right, but I know when I see the Get that there will be a matching Restore (I don't have to infer from context or looking ahead that the object isn't handed off in some other way). Jed
