On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've pushed some fixes for VecPlaceArray/VecResetArray, trying to the >> pair a bit more smarter. However, the I'm not sure what's the use case >> in VecPlaceArray for accepting NULL for the array. Just in case, I did >> not changed this, but if NULL is actually pased, then the call is now >> non-op. Is this fine? I'm missing something?? > > I think you would like to reset the array back to NULL sometimes, to clear > out > memory of an old array it no longer owns. Is this right? >
Not sure if I understood you comment, but the companion call VecResetArray() restores the original array. Before my fix, the Vec was left actually pointing to a NULL. > >> >> -- >> Lisandro Dalc?n >> --------------- >> Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) >> Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) >> Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) >> PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina >> Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > -- Lisandro Dalc?n --------------- Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
