Thats awesome. 80% true efficiency for 1K nodes on under 1 million unknowns. Thats only 1,000 unknowns per proc. If we were cranking the problems size, I am sure you'd be up in the 90s. Hopefully this summer we can deliver you much improved serial performance as well. BTW, I want to talk sometime about the subduction benchmark. Van Keken talked about it at Purdue, so I got a diametrically opposed viewpoint from a sympathetic person. It was eye opening.
Matt On 4/2/06, Richard Katz <katz at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thought you might be interested to see this. > > The simulation is finite-volume, steady-state, non-Newtonian CFD in 3D. > And, of course, it is done using PETSc (version 2.3.1). > > How does this compare to other PETSc-based simulations? > > Cheers > Rich > > Barry -- I had a problem with the the jobs that we discussed but I'm > hoping to run them properly tonight. > > > > -- "Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec Guiness -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20060402/fec33cfc/attachment.html>
