> > Come on guys, it is completely moronic that bitbucket doesn't support > subdirectories to hold repositories. No amount of rationalization can > provide a reason for this absurdity. >
What's completely moronic is that petsc.cs.itt is hosting so many repositories that are mostly cruft: Allen-Cahn-2D Cahn-Hillard-1D Cahn-Hillard-2D FMM FMM-dev ams-dev composing-nonlinear-solvers cudaFMM dft dft-fft dft-log dft-mg dft-rfd externalpackages-old/MUMPS_4.7.3 externalpackages-old/MUMPS_4.9.2 externalpackages-old/ParMetis externalpackages-old/ParMetis-3.1.1 externalpackages-old/SuperLU_4.0 externalpackages-old/SuperLU_DIST_2.2 externalpackages-old/SuperLU_DIST_2.4 externalpackages-old/UMFPACK-5.2 externalpackages-old/f2cblaslapack externalpackages-old/f2cblaslapack-3.1.1.q.old externalpackages-old/fblaslapack externalpackages-old/hypre-2.6.0b externalpackages-old/sowing-1.1.11 lwang-dev multiphysics petsc-dev-new??? petscpathlib pthread-paper reacting_flow releases/BuildSystem-2.3.1 releases/BuildSystem-2.3.2 releases/BuildSystem-2.3.3 releases/BuildSystem-3.0.0 releases/BuildSystem-3.1 simpleConfigure temp/petsc-dev-ts If you look at the repositories left, only tutorials and externalpackages exist. We can even put the latter here: https://bitbucket.org/externalpackages For the private paper repositories, bitbucket gives you an unlimited number of private repos for free. Some of Jed's rationalizations are going off the deep end. > Woah! That's the pot calling the kettle black. > * In order to not have a Releases directory he states: "I think separate > clones for every release is clutter." > You honestly think it's worth keeping repositories around that haven't been touched in 6 years? How is that not clutter? Face it, bitbucket has this really stupid feature. Funny, we say the same thing about your commit messages :-) I see no upside to bitbucket and hence I only see a downside, so why change? Do you not remember getting burned by fail2ban while at the Utah (Nevada?) workshop? > Except Sean doesn't want to drag his ass over to IIT twice a year and > people want to use buggy wireless networks. > People! *None* of us would have to do *anything* to maintain the server. No more buying new hard drives, no more accidental shut-downs, *OTHER* people would fix that stuff. Tell me the real reason you want to use bitbucket. Just to upset you and then laugh when we see you pull your hair out. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120209/ec95f5de/attachment.html>
