> > Hmm openid is orthongonal. As I understand things - its just a > machanism to not maintain yet-another-passwd-for-yet-another-site. >
Yes, Satish is right about this. [i.e setup openid with any openid provider. and then user this > credential to login to accounts at 10 different sites. Obviously each > site will track you as a different user - so they like to give you a > user name]. > > But you can ignore this - and do a userid/passwd just for bitbucket. > > The model is: > > you have an 'account' - and can create repos there. Now you are the > owner of the repos. > > Then you can give 'admin' privilidges to other 'account' users on any > given repo. And also create groups to give read/write permissions > etc.. > > So they have this distinction of 'owner' vs 'admin' [and I think only > owner can delete repos] Again, correct. Either shared password or OpenID. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120210/ed6a7561/attachment.html>
