On Aug 14, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 14:07, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > So if an explicit method is used then the SNES object is generated and TSView > causes the SNES object to be printed even though it is never used and doesn't > make sense in that context. > > What is the plan to fix this? Currently lots of nightly builds in TS are > broken because -ts_view prints SNES object but output/* files do not have > them. > > Yeah, I want to hold functions in the SNES because otherwise there would be > too many combinations to have decent code that wasn't so order dependent. We > can just have the TS implementation declare whether it is implicit or > explicit. > > Or we could print based on whether the SNES was actually used (e.g. > setupcalled or SNESGetNumberFunctionEvals), but this would skip printing the > SNES if it is paired with an implicit method that just hasn't used the SNES > yet. > > I think it may be useful to know if the TS implementation is implicit, > explicit, or both, but if we didn't need/want to know, then we should just > move the call to SNESView() down to each implementation.
For now I think it needs to be moved down to each implementation (currently uglyness is spewed with explicit methods). I'll do it. I assume everything but Euler, RK and Sundials use SNES? Barry
