El 21/08/2011, a las 19:53, Barry Smith escribi?:

> 
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jose E. Roman wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Ok. I will take the opportunity to update the other partitioners. By the 
>> way, the interface to Jostle is broken. Jostle is not distributed in source 
>> code, so I would vote for removing the interface. Any objection?
> 
>  Yes, take Jostle out. 

Done.
By the way, --download-ptscotch gets it from gforge.inria.fr rather than 
ftp.mcs.anl.gov. This may cause problems in the future.
Jose


> 
>  Supposedly someone here is doing a new parmetis so you shouldn't do that one.
> 
>> 
>> Question: I used identifiers such as MP_PTSCOTCH_QUALITY as a shortcut of 
>> MATPARTITIONING_PTSCOTCH_QUALITY. Should the long version be preferred?
> 
>   We are limited by 31 characters total so your short cut is correct.
> 
>   Barry
> 
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> 
>> El 20/08/2011, a las 22:17, Barry Smith escribi?:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I have updated all the Scotch stuff to use the proper PTScotch names:
>>> 
>>>   --download-ptscotch     -mat_partitioning_type ptscotch   
>>> MatPartitioningSetType(p,MATPARTITIONINGPTSCOTCH) Scotch.py to PTScotch.py  
>>>  etc etc
>>> 
>>>  You will need to hg pull BuildSystem also.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Barry
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Jose E. Roman wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> El 20/08/2011, a las 05:45, Barry Smith escribi?:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Questions for anyone with knowledge on this subject:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Are Scotch and ptscotch different packages? 
>>>> 
>>>> They are different libraries but are included in the same distribution 
>>>> file. The tarball contains both the serial and parallel versions (as 
>>>> opposed to e.g. Metis/Parmetis).
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> How come the download site has scotch_5.1.11.tar.gz and 
>>>>> scotch_5.1.11_esmumps.tar.gz and neither mentions ptscotch do one or both 
>>>>> of them contain ptscotch? Do either contain scotch? What is the mumps 
>>>>> business in the name?
>>>> 
>>>> Both of them contain scotch+ptscotch. I have diff'ed the two of them. The 
>>>> esmumps one contains an additional file esmumps.c with a single function 
>>>> esmumps(): "This routine acts as an interface between ordering software 
>>>> such as MUMPS and Scotch+Emilio." The other difference is that esmumps has
>>>> typedef int32_t SCOTCH_Num;
>>>> instead of
>>>> typedef int SCOTCH_Num;
>>>> (also for indices) so probably 64-bit integers/indices are disabled in 
>>>> this version.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If this uses ptscotch why is the call in the source code 
>>>>> SCOTCH_dgraphBuild()? and doesn't mention pt?
>>>> 
>>>> The differences in usage/interface between scotch and ptscotch are very 
>>>> small:
>>>> 1) One has to include either scotch.h or ptscotch.h, and link with 
>>>> -lscotch or -lptscotch
>>>> 2) For ptscotch one has to use distributed graphs, i.e. call 
>>>> SCOTCH_dgraph*() instead of SCOTCH_graph*()
>>>> Apart from this, the interface seems to be the same.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If scotch and ptscotch are different shouldn't scotch.py be called 
>>>>> ptscotch.py?  
>>>> 
>>>> They are different because the algorithms available in the parallel 
>>>> version are much more limited compared to the serial version. But since 
>>>> they are both included in the same distribution file, I guess it doesn't 
>>>> matter to call it scotch.py or ptscotch.py.
>>>> 
>>>> In terms of MatPartitioning, it could be possible to create two 
>>>> partitioners, one for scotch and another for ptscotch. But I think it is 
>>>> far more useful to have the ptscotch interface, because the sequential one 
>>>> would require gathering the whole graph in a single process (as it happens 
>>>> with chaco and party). Also, in that case one could also have another one 
>>>> for Metis (since the method is not exactly the same as Parmetis).
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pastix seems to use either scotch or ptscotch?  Will anyone ever fix the 
>>>>> install of pastix.py for PETSc? Will that require a --download-scotch 
>>>>> that installs sequential scotch?
>>>> 
>>>> I have no idea about Pastix (I haven't seen pastix.py in petsc-dev), but I 
>>>> guess it will be enough to force --download-scotch together with 
>>>> --download-pastix.
>>>> 
>>>> Jose
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Barry
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Jose E. Roman wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have rewritten the Scotch interface so that it can be used again as a 
>>>>>> MatPartitioning object. I have done limited testing, so please let me 
>>>>>> know if problems arise.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The interface is really to PT-Scotch rather than serial Scotch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some comments regarding configure's download-scotch option:
>>>>>> - It will probably fail in batch environments since the program 
>>>>>> 'dummysizes' must be run before compiling
>>>>>> - Compilation requires lex & yacc, I don't know if these are tested by 
>>>>>> configure.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to