On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:

> Okay, but what's going on with petsc-3.1 on that machine?  It doesn't fail.
>  Is that because dlsym(0,string) works?
> Or was dynamic loading disabled in it?

--with-dynamic=0 is usually the default buid.

petsc-3.1 never did dlopen()/dlsym() for this case - but petsc-dev
does do dlopen()/dlsym() even with --with-dynamic=0 for basic ex2
example code - hece it crashes.

Satish

Reply via email to