Hi all, Currently, there is an option to specify the blas/lapack library files --with-scalapack-lib=[<list of .a files>]. This is indeed necessary, because MKL provides a large choice of libraries to link against.
However, MKL static libraries have object inter-dependencies, and requires --start-group/--end-group linker options. All libraries in the group are searched repeatedly until all inter-dependencies resolved. For example, the following options is suggested for a configuration ( http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-mkl-link-line-advisor/): $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_scalapack_lp64.a -Wl,--start-group $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.a $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.a $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.a $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_blacs_intelmpi_lp64.a -Wl,--end-group -lpthread I'd like to propose an extension to the --with-scalapack-lib syntax to support start/end group. Consider the following example: --with-blas-lapack-lib=[ /xxx/scalapack_lp64.a, [/xxx/libmkl_intel_lp64.a, /xxx/libmkl_sequential.a, libmkl_core.a, /xxx/libmkl_blacs_intelmpi_lp64.a] ] The embedded list indicates a set of libraries to be grouped up. Would this be possible? This isn't a problem if we link to dynamic libraries, because -l for dynamic libraries doesn't have to be ordered as in the case of static libraries. I hate the wicked order rule for .a libraries, but have to live with it... Further, I guess -Bstatic options are dropped somewhere (I haven't checked it in detail). The final PACKAGES_LIBS macro never contains -Bstatic, so end application will always link to the static libraries. Regards, Shen Chen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110411/0a8e1d9c/attachment.html>
