On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Satish Balay wrote: > > > Yes - not having file comments makes it more difficult to go back in > > file history. > > > > But one way to look at it is - for some of these senarios - it meanas > > multiple changesets should be created [with the correct grouping of > > changes] instead of the atempted single changeset. > > Yes, the problem with this is that there is no decent way of > making multiple change-sets.
- quit emacs without typing in any comments [so no commit is done] - 'hg status' to get the list of modified files - hg commit file1 file2 [ to make the appropriate changeset] I use 'hg ct' though.. > If I could just edit out the files > I did not want when doing the comment for a commit it would make > life a MILLION times better (could that be added?). I'll check on this on the mercurial list.. Satish > > Barry > > > > > And perhaps some comments can actually go into the code. > > > > Satish > > > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > Not having file by file comments for changesets is > > > starting to annoy me. > > > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > > > >
