On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I totally agree it is a hack and should never be used, BUT as far as I > was aware in no place in PETSc did we do that? If that is it should be > fixed. But the fix is likely not forcing mpiuni to have two communicators > it is just to do things right. Do you not consider http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/169c19e9ea54to be a hack? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120716/7b5337f9/attachment.html>
