On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> So what you're saying is that your system could be extended to do this? >> I'm not disagreeing, but I think my suggestion is more maintainable and >> extensible. As I said in my first reply, the differences are mostly >> cosmetic, but I think there is good reason to prefer the form I suggest. >> The important thing in either case is to have a database of tests so we can >> program behavior. >> > > Obviously I disagree. I responded to the maintainability argument, but you > just ignored the response. > Since it's maintainable to put everything in one file, why not put all of PETSc in one file? I prefer local declaration of tests and the error conditions are handled much better. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120726/f54f89d2/attachment.html>
