On 13 August 2012 13:47, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 13 August 2012 13:40, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Should I remove all the MPIDense stuff from PETSc now? It is uses >>> PLAPACK which is buggy and unsupported. >>> >> >> Do you mean to completely kill the subtype implementation? > > Yes, people will use the new elemental interface for dense matrices. > Will that not work for your needs? Could you live with a MPIDense that did > not use PLAPACK? So had very limited functionality? >
As long as we have some kind of dense implementation (mostly for debugging purposes), I'm fine. -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
