El 23/08/2012, a las 18:27, Satish Balay escribi?: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Jose E. Roman wrote: > >> Anyway, it would be a good opportunity to upgrade to Lapack 3.4 (the >> toclapack.sh script should work for this version as well). > > Ok. Will do this. Hower I see a bunch of embeded code in toclapack.sh > - corresponding to different lapack versions. Would this be a problem? > > Satish > --------- > > asterix:/home/balay/spetsc/bin/maint>grep -i version toclapack.sh |grep LAPACK > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.3.0) -- */ > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.0) -- > /* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.0) -- > /* -- LAPACK routine (version 3.2.2) -- */ > #/* -- LAPACK auxiliary routine (version 3.1) -- */ > asterix:/home/balay/spetsc/bin/maint>
There should be no problem. Anyway, we will check this and modify toclapack.sh if necessary. We will also test the w* subrotines more. I will come back to you tomorrow. Jose
