On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Its not wrong. This is the way I wanted it. You set the PetscSection and > give up control. If you > do not want to give up control, then call PetscObjectReference() before > passing it in. > Since this is (a) different from everything else in PETSc and (b) not explicitly documented, it is doubly wrong. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120830/885d9e88/attachment-0001.html>
