On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jack Poulson <jack.poulson at >> gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> In these cases, it sounds like the current best option is then to avoid >>> using the CMake build system and manually link Elemental and Clique. If you >>> have any suggestions, I am happy to work towards them as soon as possible. >>> >>> Satish's suggestion (which I agree with) is for me to add support in >>> Clique's CMake build system for a user-specified Elemental library. >>> >> >> I think this the Right Way. >> > > I believe its The Right Way@ (copyright Barry Smith 1995). > Nope, it's a sleeper patent. The plan is to wait until enough corporations with money use this patented innovation, then sue them for billions. American Innovation at work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120831/173a32c0/attachment-0001.html>
