On Sep 7, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
>    The allure of Powerpoint is I can just start it up and poke around the 
> menus to put together a few slides that look ok very quickly. If I want a 
> table I just hunt for table and do it, same with graph etc etc. But like 
> all/most GUI based systems for anything once you want more detailed control 
> or to automate something or to do something real complex Powerpoint becomes a 
> massive pain.
> 
>     Is there, or could we set up, a repository of Beamer "templates" that 
> would make Beamer almost as easy as Powerpoint to quickly throw something 
> together. Basically the source for a bunch of INDEPENDENT slides that do 
> standard things people want to do with Powerpoint?
> 
> Unfortunately, despite LaTeX being better than the alternatives, it's still 
> terrible for libraries. Slides don't stand alone all that well because they 
> need certain preamble includes (like TikZ packages).

   So can we blame Knuth for this or is it  Leslie Lamport's fault?  Anyways 
this is is a majorly bad design decision someone made way back.

   Maybe we can make a beamer preprocessor that takes all the "preamble stuff" 
from all slides and passes it all up to the preamble before running latex? 
Cause this is a stupid limitation.

   Barry



> The latex-beamer manual has lots of good examples. For TikZ, the manual and 
> texample.net both have good examples. Unfortunately, the huge volume of 
> documentation still doesn't make the learning curve particularly gentle.
> 
> There are some reasonable beamer-poster examples on the internet and I have 
> done several posters that way over the years. If high-res versions of the 
> various logos and "official colers" are available somewhere, I can do up a 
> theme that will make poster creation fast in the future. I should probably do 
> this before December in any case because a couple of us have posters at AGU.
>  
>  Where we can easily add new ones?  Also crude placement of multiple things 
> in Powerpoint is so simple, just move things around, it is painful to have to 
> place things by exact location specifications in Beamer; on the other hand 
> exact placement in Powerpoint is difficult. It takes me three seconds to put 
> four different size images on a slide in Powerpoint. Are there ways to do 
> that in Beamer that are almost as fast?
> 
> 
>    Barry
> 
> 

Reply via email to