El 04/10/2012, a las 03:40, Satish Balay escribi?: > Which XXXType shows this problem? > > I've checked a couple and they look fine. > > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/Vec/VecType.html > vs > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/Vec/VecType.html > > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/KSP/KSPType.html > vs > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/KSP/KSPType.html > > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/TS/TSType.html > vs > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/TS/TSType.html > > Satish
Oops. I saw the problem in SLEPc only - did not check in PETSc. The problem is not due to changing to typedef, but because I was using /*E .. E*/ comments instead of /*J .. J*/ Fixed now. Sorry for the noise. Jose
