I don't want this.

https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/changeset/3e5bdcc83cd970452d0648da9955f789cc574198


The whole reason I added PetscComplex rather than just using PetscScalar is
that I wanted to use complex numbers for method design (polynomial
optimization and time integration). What was the actual problem? If
Microsoft has broken C99, then PETSC_HAVE_C99_COMPLEX should not be defined.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121025/e8ecb39e/attachment.html>

Reply via email to