On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not understand. Codim 0 and 1 are handled in an identical way. > The user doesn't do the same thing with them. Your data structure treats them the same way (though I'm not sure how you distinguish between a tet and a quad if both are "height 0" and you don't store intermediate levels), but that seems like an implementation detail to me. > I am not against some convenience interface for dim/co-dim, however it > would > just be implemented by making a label, since we have many equivalent > structural > things which would map to it. > Fine, I care much more about conceptual simplicity in the interface. I think adoption will be higher if 95% of users don't see the word "stratum". -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121110/2a7eeeb0/attachment.html>
