On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> which eventually calls PetscOptionsEnd, masking all subsequent options from >> the TS output. Choices: >> >> 1. circumvent the limitation, moving the call outside the TS options >> >> 2. make PetscOptionsBegin() behave like PetscOptionsHead() when called >> inside a currently active options section > > I prefer having them nest properly. Allowing proper nesting would eliminate this kind of problem once and and for all. So maybe PetscOptionsBegin() could be totally bagged. Barry > > Matt > >> others? > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener
