Fine with me, but it might be nice if the name could somehow convey that this is just a defect-correction iteration and need not be Newton (e.g., it's Picard if a Picard linearization is used). OTOH, the name "Newton" is much more recognizable...
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > Can we rename > > > > #define SNESLS "ls" > > #define SNESTR "tr" > > #define SNESVIRS "virs" > > #define SNESVISS "viss" > > > > to something like newtonls newtontr vinewtonrs vinewtonss? > Suggestions for names? > > +1 > > Matt > > > Now that we have many other methods than Newton these names are > terrible and confusing. > > > > Thanks > > > > Barry > > > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121202/9a41222a/attachment-0001.html>
