On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Now I have to change a bunch of output. Do you mind if I move it >> back? >> > Yes I do mind. Peter put it in a dumb spot AFTER all the linear solver > info. Note that the linear solver info can be very extensive when using field > split and multigrid preconditioners etc. It makes no sense for several pages > of output to separate the line search info from the nonlinear solver info. > > We just have to bite the bullet and eventually regenerate the output > files. With PETSc we don't stick with bad design decisions just because it > requires some work to change to a better design :-)
I didn't know we were going to use logic and aesthetics in this argument. Jed made me put in the automated changer, so now (he reminded me) its easy. Matt > Barry > > >> Matt >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >> their experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
