On Jan 9, 2013, at 10:19 PM, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> My summary would be that > 1. Git's ui is bad > 2. There is the crappy index thingie > 3. I don't see how git branches are better than hg bookmarks (again, the ui > is bad). > 4. I still use multiple repos along with branches in git. > 5. I am willing to bet money Satish will use multiple repos, rather than > branches. Thanks. This is why I want to see Jed and Satish's mapping; I don't want to change to git and then have a gotcha of "but that was easy in hg but is a big fucking pain in git and I have to do it every day". Barry > > On Jan 9, 2013 10:12 PM, "Dmitry Karpeev" <karpeev at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2013 10:10 PM, "Sean Farley" <sean.michael.farley at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> > > wrote: > > > I personally find git (and its branches) rather cumbersome and wish > > > libmesh > > > used mercurial instead :-) > > > > Not to mention git's atrocious interface. > Yes, I forgot to mention that. > > > > > And if hgsubversion actually worked there would no need for git :-) > > > > I've used that to access libmesh all the time; what didn't work?
