As in, PetscFunctionListRegister? I guess I read that as registering the list with something (a destructor?) rather than adding an item to the list.
I don't care about Query vs. Find or even Get. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > What about at least moving the Add to Register? And why have both > query and find? > > Barry > > On Jan 15, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > So we would have PetscObjectRegister(C,"Mat_Redundant",container)? > Somehow I find Compose more intuitive for this meaning and don't see a > tangible benefit to changing it. > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > Note that currently XXXRegister and XXXCompose eventually calls YYYAdd > at the lower level and XXXQuery calls YYYFind at the lower level. > > > > Why have all these words? > > > > I propose Register, Compose and Add -> Register > > > > Find, Query -> Find > > > > Problems? > > > > Barry > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130115/68f5cb3b/attachment.html>
