On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> You don't like the idea of whitespace in the diff or you don't like having > a space after if, while, and for? If the former, tell did to ignore > whitespace. If the latter, get over it. > There is no getting over this. This is exactly why people hate these standards. Prescribing a few, coarse features is fine and improves readability. Specifying the tiniest details is senseless and intrusive fascism. Matt > On Jan 21, 2013 8:10 AM, "Matthew Knepley" <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at >>> gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I thought we agreed that some of this is not crucial. I can't >>>> stand this in my code. Hate Hate Hate. >>>> >>> >>> Oh come on, three "Hate"s over using standard spacing (K&R and most >>> other style guidelines)? Consist code formatting is good. >>> >> >> This is foolish consistency. Style *guidelines* are supposed to be that. >> I can't stand looking at this. >> >> Matt >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/cf69a5905ee4 >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> -- >>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >>>> experiments lead. >>>> -- Norbert Wiener >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130121/c1a0fd75/attachment-0001.html>
