On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Karl Rupp <rupp at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Hi Matt, > > Since there was a lack of consensus on alternatives, I applied >> Matt's Right Way here: >> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/__**petsc-dev/commits/__** >> fabf60c7d012db5a109255579665b5**__c2<https://bitbucket.org/petsc/__petsc-dev/commits/__fabf60c7d012db5a109255579665b5__c2> >> <https://bitbucket.org/petsc/**petsc-dev/commits/** >> fabf60c7d012db5a109255579665b5**c2<https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/fabf60c7d012db5a109255579665b5c2> >> > >> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/__**buildsystem/commits/__** >> 355293e9e4e0588644168f629930b5**__66<https://bitbucket.org/petsc/__buildsystem/commits/__355293e9e4e0588644168f629930b5__66> >> >> <https://bitbucket.org/petsc/**buildsystem/commits/** >> 355293e9e4e0588644168f629930b5**66<https://bitbucket.org/petsc/buildsystem/commits/355293e9e4e0588644168f629930b566> >> > >> >> This is mostly done to ensure that we don't forget about the initial >> goal of fixing the issue. Cleaner/more unified solutions to the >> problem are still welcome... >> >> >> This is almost there. I will have BuildSystem write the define directly >> like Barry suggested. >> > > Okay, thanks! Just make sure you set up the macros in the right way (Barry > accidentally interchanged the old and the new versions in his email). > How are you testing this? Matt > Best regards, > Karli > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130122/e03f3523/attachment-0001.html>
