On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Blaise A Bourdin wrote:
> >> the usual naming scheme is just the version number, but for petsc, most > >> supercomputing centers use %version-%arch > >> the installer will copy the file into $MODULEPATH/petsc/%version-%arch, or > >> the user to $HOME/.modulefiles > >> > >> Of course, %version-%arch is a really silly name out of context. How > >> about petsc-%version-%arch, somewhere within $PETSC_DIR/$PETSC_ARCH, or > >> $PETSC_DIR/$PETSC_ARCH/modulefiles/%version-%arch ? > > > > And PETSC_ARCH has no singificance with prefix install [the > > significant text is in the prefix-path - and one doesn't have to match > > PETSC_ARCH to this significant text] > > True. I actually realized that as I was hitting send For now I've changed name to '%version-%arch'. Perhaps we should provide a configure option --with-module-name=foobar [for situations where the user can provide a prefered name] > > BTW: Is the following notation ok? [google didn't help] > > > > prepend-path PATH /home/balay/spetsc/asterix64/bin:/home/balay/spetsc/bin > > It seems to work, but For now - I've pushed the above notation. Satish
