On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> These changes are pretty obnoxious for contributors who have to constantly > rebase or merge (generating useless merge commits) amidst the constant > formatting changes. Since most of these are applications of scripts, can we > just enqueue them and apply them all at once when you consider them > complete? > By your own evaluation (~10%), these commits constitute a "fringe" element at best :) I don't think they are hard to rebase. Matt > If you want to publish the changes for comment, make a branch (well, hg > clone) and push there, with an explicit statement that those patches will > _not_ be merged directly back to petsc-dev. (Their effect will be applied > by running the script in petsc-dev when it's time to apply.) > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130128/f68865dc/attachment.html>
