On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we have to make a distinction as to what kind of code is in there. > The proposed > stub does nothing but raise an error, just as Fortran stubs do nothing but > forward the call. > To me, this should be kept out of petscblaslapack.h. > petscblaslapack.h needs to know not to redefine those function names. I'd much rather have #if defined(PETSC_MISSING_LAPACK_FOO) ... definition that raises an error #else ... normal definition #endif than #if !defined(PETSC_MISSING_LAPACK_FOO) ... normal definition /* missing definition is generated */ #endif -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130206/143cadc1/attachment-0001.html>
