Stupid bitbucket doesn't let me respond to this.
I think this is to handle the case where the vectors were obtained without
the appropriate block size so the routines called below cannot be work
properly. Perhaps the code should be changed so that the x and y bs are only
set if the jac->bs is a legitimate value and not when it is -1.
Barry
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jed Brown <Bitbucket <commits-noreply at bitbucket.org>>
> Subject: Re: petsc/petsc-dev added -valgrind -debugger option to petscmpiexec
> (commit 398f06830ac9d0920f8d4e4d0bac972857d520d4)
> Date: February 12, 2013 7:10:23 AM CST
> To: bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
>
> New comment on changeset:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/398f06830ac9d0920f8d4e4d0bac972857d520d4#comment-146984
>
> Jed Brown (jedbrown) said:
>
> What is this trying to achieve? In `runex19_4`, this results in changing the
> block size from `4` to `-1`. Can we delete these lines or do we need to set
> `jac->bs` in that case?
>
> --
> This is an comment notification from bitbucket.org.
> You are receiving this because you are participating
> in a comment thread.
