My concern was if a bad implementation always did some terrible thing with
locks (even if only one thread would ever exist) thus hurting performance.
Is there no way to just tell MPI there ARE and WILL be no threads?
Barry
On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> Do we really ALWAYS want to call this version even if we are not monkeying
> with threads at ALL?
>
> Thanks
>
> Barry
>
> ierr = MPI_Initialized(&flag);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> if (!flag) {
> if (PETSC_COMM_WORLD != MPI_COMM_NULL)
> SETERRQ(PETSC_COMM_SELF,PETSC_ERR_SUP,"You cannot set PETSC_COMM_WORLD if you
> have not initialized MPI first");
> #if defined(PETSC_HAVE_MPI_INIT_THREAD)
> {
> PetscMPIInt provided;
> ierr =
> MPI_Init_thread(argc,args,MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED,&provided);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> }
> #else
> ierr = MPI_Init(argc,args);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
> The implementation of MPI_Init just probes around the environment and calls
> MPI_Init_thread. There is no performance advantage of MPI_THREAD_SINGLE over
> MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED so I think the code here is fine.
