On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should just double all include files: > > petscksp.h > petsckspfwd.h > > You don't have to know anything about petsc*fwd.h unless you > want lightweight includes, and there is no way to misinterpret what it is. > petsc*fwd.h or petsc*types.h? Is there an established convention here? I agree that this makes the code much more systematic. It will impact users significantly if we apply this to Mat and Vec, but then include-what-you-use would work precisely. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130215/28a0c501/attachment.html>
