On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Matt, what is this about? >> > > I think this is Satish (blame gets confused by the move). > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/31d7f3bac39971d5406309dcc1cc1df33996fbe9 > Don't we wrap the entire interface in EXTERN_C > so that C++ people who include the header do not mangle PETSc functions? > I was asking about the second block. I don't understand why we would ever want the C header to be broken when include from C++. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130305/dbee33a6/attachment.html>
